U.S. Senate roll-call vote intelligence: party cohesion, controversy
Daily intelligence panel of every Senate roll-call vote in the 119th Congress, 2nd session, from the keyless Senate LIS XML feed (senate.gov): vote tallies, Republican/Democratic/Independent positions with intra-party disagreement rates computed from the individual ballots, turnout against 100 seats, and a documented 0-100 controversy score (closeness of the vote, caucus dissent, party split) ranked as controversy_rank. Flags identify unanimous votes, Democrat/Republican splits, cross-partisan alignment, caucus dissent, and suspected free votes (>=1% mean disagreement, a heuristic). Caveats: only recorded roll calls appear (no voice votes); Present and Not Voting/Absent are abstentions, not dissent; vacancies may push turnout below 100%; party tallies are recomputed from the ballots. U.S. federal public domain (17 U.S.C. 105); commercial_use=yes.
Les titres et les descriptions proviennent des sources de données, en anglais.
- Lignes
- 244
- Colonnes
- 41
- Cadence de la source
- Quotidienne
- Dernière actualisation
- 27 sept. 2026
- Thème
- government
| Colonne | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| vote_id | string | Stable vote identifier: '<chamber>-<congress>-<session>/<vote number>', e.g. 'house-119-2/314'. Primary key. |
| chamber | string | Chamber of Congress: 'house' or 'senate'. |
| congress | integer | U.S. Congress number (119 for every row). |
| session | integer | Session of the Congress (2 for every row). |
| vote_number | integer | Roll-call (House) or vote (Senate) number within the session, in order of occurrence. |
| vote_date | string | Date the roll-call vote was held (ISO date). (unit: ISO date) |
| country_code | string | ISO alpha-3 country code (USA for every row). (unit: ISO 3166-1 alpha-3) |
| question_text | string | Vote question, verbatim from the upstream feed: House 'vote-question' plus 'vote-desc' (e.g. 'On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass — Retire through Ownership Act'); Senate 'vote_question_text' (e.g. 'On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 89'). |
| issue | string | Associated measure, verbatim upstream: House 'legis-num' (e.g. 'S 2403'); Senate 'document_name' or 'vote_title' (e.g. 'H.Con.Res. 89'). Null when the vote has no associated measure. |
| vote_type | string | Majority requirement, verbatim upstream: House 'vote-type' (e.g. '2/3 YEA-AND-NAY'); Senate 'majority_requirement' (e.g. '1/2'). |
| result | string | Official vote outcome, verbatim upstream (e.g. 'Passed', 'Concurrent Resolution Rejected (49-50)'). |
| yea_total | integer | Ballots cast 'Yea'. |
| nay_total | integer | Ballots cast 'Nay'. |
| present_total | integer | Ballots cast 'Present' (counted as abstentions for turnout, excluded from disagreement math). |
| not_voting_total | integer | Members recorded 'Not Voting' (Senate: also those counted 'absent' in the official tally). |
| total_ballots | integer | yea_total + nay_total + present_total + not_voting_total. |
| margin_votes | integer | Absolute vote margin |yea - nay|. |
| margin_pct | float | 100 * margin_votes / (yea + nay); null when no yea/nay votes were cast. (unit: percent) |
| turnout_pct | float | 100 * total_ballots / chamber seats (435 House, 100 Senate). Vacancies can push this below 100%. (unit: percent) |
| republican_vote | string | Republican position: 'yes', 'no', 'split' (exactly tied caucus), 'didnt_vote' (no Yea/Nay ballots), or null when the party has no members on record. |
| republican_disagreement | float | Fraction of Republican Yea+Nay ballots cast against the party position (0 = full discipline); min(yea,nay)/(yea+nay) for a 'split' position, 0.0 for 'didnt_vote'. Present/Not Voting ballots excluded. (unit: fraction) |
| democratic_vote | string | Democratic position: 'yes', 'no', 'split', 'didnt_vote', or null. |
| democratic_disagreement | float | Fraction of Democratic Yea+Nay ballots cast against the party position. (unit: fraction) |
| independent_vote | string | Independent position: 'yes', 'no', 'split', 'didnt_vote', or null (the House independent group usually has no members). Senate 'ID' ballots count as Independent. |
| independent_disagreement | float | Fraction of Independent Yea+Nay ballots cast against the party position; null when the party has no members on record. (unit: fraction) |
| n_parties_yes | integer | Parties with a 'yes' position. |
| n_parties_no | integer | Parties with a 'no' position. |
| n_parties_abstain | integer | Parties with a 'didnt_vote' position (no Yea/Nay ballots); excluded from the yes/no counts. 'split' parties are counted separately (neither yes nor no). |
| n_dissenting_parties | integer | Parties with disagreement > 0 on this vote. |
| max_disagreement | float | Largest intra-party disagreement fraction on this vote. (unit: fraction) |
| max_disagreement_party | string | Column prefix of the party with the largest disagreement (null when every party voted with full discipline). |
| mean_disagreement | float | Mean intra-party disagreement across parties with members on this vote. (unit: fraction) |
| unanimous_flag | boolean | True when every party with members voted the same yes/no way (no split or abstaining parties). |
| dem_rep_split_flag | boolean | True when the Democratic and Republican positions are yes/no and oppose each other. |
| cross_partisan_flag | boolean | True when the Democratic and Republican positions are yes/no and identical. |
| dissent_flag | boolean | True when any party had intra-party disagreement > 0 on this vote. |
| free_vote_suspect_flag | boolean | Heuristic only: true when mean_disagreement >= 0.01. Congressional feeds publish no whip designations, so this is an inference, not an official label. |
| controversy_score | float | 0-100 controversy score = 100 * (0.45 * closeness + 0.35 * max_disagreement + 0.20 * party_split), where closeness = 1 - |yea-nay|/(yea+nay), and party_split = min(n_yes, n_no)/n_parties_with_yes_no_position. 0 = unanimous whipped vote; ~100 = tied vote with caucus dissent and an even party split. (unit: 0-100 score) |
| controversy_rank | integer | Rank of controversy_score (1 = most controversial; deterministic tie-break: vote_date desc, vote_number desc). Ranked within each chamber's panel. |
| provenance_url | string | Upstream URL of this vote's roll-call XML (clerk.house.gov or senate.gov). |
| row_hash | string | Deterministic 16-hex-char row hash over chamber, vote_id, date, tallies and per-party positions/disagreement (idempotency). |
10 premières lignes d’exemple — un aperçu, pas le jeu de données complet.
| vote_id | chamber | congress | session | vote_number | vote_date | country_code | question_text | issue | vote_type | result | yea_total | nay_total | present_total | not_voting_total | total_ballots | margin_votes | margin_pct | turnout_pct | republican_vote | republican_disagreement | democratic_vote | democratic_disagreement | independent_vote | independent_disagreement | n_parties_yes | n_parties_no | n_parties_abstain | n_dissenting_parties | max_disagreement | max_disagreement_party | mean_disagreement | unanimous_flag | dem_rep_split_flag | cross_partisan_flag | dissent_flag | free_vote_suspect_flag | controversy_score | controversy_rank | provenance_url | row_hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| senate-119-2/1 | senate | 119 | 2 | 1 | 2026-01-05 | USA | On the Nomination PN12-1 | PN12-1 | 1/2 | Nomination Confirmed (50-35) | 50 | 35 | 0 | 15 | 100 | 15 | 17,647 | 100 | yes | 0,023 | no | 0,154 | split | 0,5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0,5 | independent | 0,226 | false | true | false | true | true | 64,56 | 4 | https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00001.xml | c2588ae7b4deec55 |
| senate-119-2/2 | senate | 119 | 2 | 2 | 2026-01-06 | USA | On the Nomination PN499-11 | PN499-11 | 1/2 | Nomination Confirmed (53-47) | 53 | 47 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 6 | 6 | 100 | yes | 0 | no | 0 | no | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | false | true | false | false | false | 48,97 | 161 | https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00002.xml | c3765ef71bb04892 |
| senate-119-2/3 | senate | 119 | 2 | 3 | 2026-01-06 | USA | On the Nomination PN373 | PN373 | 1/2 | Nomination Confirmed (52-48) | 52 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 4 | 4 | 100 | yes | 0,019 | no | 0 | no | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0,019 | republican | 0,006 | false | true | false | true | false | 50,53 | 86 | https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00003.xml | 8d084af44f816f7f |
| senate-119-2/4 | senate | 119 | 2 | 4 | 2026-01-07 | USA | On the Motion to Proceed S.J.Res. 86 | S.J.Res. 86 | 1/2 | Motion to Proceed Rejected (43-50) | 43 | 50 | 0 | 7 | 100 | 7 | 7,527 | 100 | no | 0 | yes | 0 | yes | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | false | true | false | false | false | 48,28 | 202 | https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00004.xml | 93cb9dfa7c6e0055 |
| senate-119-2/5 | senate | 119 | 2 | 5 | 2026-01-08 | USA | On the Motion to Discharge S.J.Res. 98 | S.J.Res. 98 | 1/2 | Motion to Discharge Agreed to (52-47) | 52 | 47 | 0 | 1 | 100 | 5 | 5,051 | 100 | no | 0,096 | yes | 0 | yes | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0,096 | republican | 0,032 | false | true | false | true | true | 52,76 | 41 | https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00005.xml | 2ea94f38e43de4cf |
| senate-119-2/6 | senate | 119 | 2 | 6 | 2026-01-08 | USA | On the Nomination PN615-2 | PN615-2 | 1/2 | Nomination Confirmed (53-40) | 53 | 40 | 0 | 7 | 100 | 13 | 13,978 | 100 | yes | 0 | no | 0,133 | split | 0,5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0,5 | independent | 0,211 | false | true | false | true | true | 66,21 | 2 | https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00006.xml | 2933086c0d02146d |
| senate-119-2/7 | senate | 119 | 2 | 7 | 2026-01-12 | USA | On Cloture on the Motion to Proceed H.R. 6938 | H.R. 6938 | 3/5 | Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Agreed to (80-13, 3/5 majority required) | 80 | 13 | 0 | 7 | 100 | 67 | 72,043 | 100 | yes | 0,064 | yes | 0,205 | split | 0,5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0,5 | independent | 0,256 | false | false | true | true | true | 30,08 | 226 | https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00007.xml | e90ceae1350737b1 |
| senate-119-2/8 | senate | 119 | 2 | 8 | 2026-01-13 | USA | On the Motion to Proceed S.J.Res. 84 | S.J.Res. 84 | 1/2 | Motion to Proceed Rejected (47-52) | 47 | 52 | 0 | 1 | 100 | 5 | 5,051 | 100 | no | 0 | yes | 0 | yes | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | false | true | false | false | false | 49,39 | 135 | https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00008.xml | d6c52b1f4f0b6a4b |
| senate-119-2/9 | senate | 119 | 2 | 9 | 2026-01-14 | USA | On the Point of Order S.J.Res. 98 | S.J.Res. 98 | 1/2 | Point of Order Well Taken (50-50, Vice President of the United States, voted Yea) | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | yes | 0,057 | no | 0 | no | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0,057 | republican | 0,019 | false | true | false | true | true | 53,65 | 23 | https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00009.xml | fc22b389a3c511f4 |
| senate-119-2/10 | senate | 119 | 2 | 10 | 2026-01-15 | USA | On the Cloture Motion H.R. 6938 | H.R. 6938 | 3/5 | Cloture Motion Agreed to (85-14, 3/5 majority required) | 85 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 100 | 71 | 71,717 | 100 | yes | 0,075 | yes | 0,205 | split | 0,5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0,5 | independent | 0,26 | false | false | true | true | true | 30,23 | 225 | https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1192/vote_119_2_00010.xml | 869acd950e762688 |
- Actuelle
20260927T153951Z-a688a52bb35b · sha256 a688a52bb35b…
244 lignes · premier instantané
Dirigez n’importe quel LLM vers le point d’accès des métadonnées — la documentation ci-dessus est aussi lisible par machine (JSON-LD + Croissant).
curl "https://datazimuts.com/v1/datasets/us_congress_votes/us_senate_vote_intel" | jq '{title, rows, columns_count, license}'import requests
ds = requests.get("https://datazimuts.com/v1/datasets/us_congress_votes/us_senate_vote_intel").json()
print(ds["title"], ds["rows"], "rows")
# Sample rows for an LLM context window
for row in ds.get("sample_rows", [])[:5]:
print(row)Point d’accès API : https://datazimuts.com/v1/datasets/us_congress_votes/us_senate_vote_intel
Astuce : récupérez /llms.txt pour le catalogue complet lisible par machine.
D’où viennent ces données et ce qui en a été fait. Le travail des autres apparaît sous forme de décomptes ; seuls les projets partagés sont nommés.
Citer cet instantané
Épinglé à l’instantané 20260927T153951Z-a688a52bb35b et à son empreinte, pour que vos lecteurs obtiennent exactement les données utilisées.
U.S. House Clerk + Senate LIS roll-call feeds. (2026). U.S. Senate roll-call vote intelligence: party cohesion, controversy [Data set, snapshot 20260927T153951Z-a688a52bb35b, sha256 a688a52bb35b]. Datazimuts. Retrieved 2026-09-27, from https://datazimuts.com/fr/datasets/us_congress_votes/us_senate_vote_intel?snapshot=20260927T153951Z-a688a52bb35b
@misc{dz_us_congress_votes_us_senate_vote_intel_a688a52b,
title = {{U.S. Senate roll-call vote intelligence: party cohesion, controversy}},
author = {{U.S. House Clerk + Senate LIS roll-call feeds}},
year = {2026},
publisher = {Datazimuts},
howpublished = {\url{https://datazimuts.com/fr/datasets/us_congress_votes/us_senate_vote_intel?snapshot=20260927T153951Z-a688a52bb35b}},
note = {Snapshot 20260927T153951Z-a688a52bb35b, sha256 a688a52bb35b2c2628292f41f9594255114e2e6464a4fabe7199a636395d7a05; accessed 2026-09-27}
}Intégrer un tableau ou un graphique
Collez ce code dans n’importe quelle page. L’intégration est épinglée au même instantané, suit le thème clair ou sombre du lecteur et affiche toujours la source, la licence et un lien de retour.
<iframe src="https://datazimuts.com/embed/chart?dataset=us_congress_votes%2Fus_senate_vote_intel&lang=fr&theme=auto&snapshot=20260927T153951Z-a688a52bb35b&x=vote_date&y=congress&agg=avg" title="U.S. Senate roll-call vote intelligence: party cohesion, controversy" width="100%" height="380" style="border:0" loading="lazy"></iframe>
Posez une question sur ce jeu de données. Les réponses viennent uniquement de sa fiche, de son profil mesuré et de son historique, et citent les faits utilisés.